Sunday, January 5, 2014

Playoff Rankings - A True Balancing Act


 

In the playoffs, one bad day can send a team packing and teams that lack balance are far more susceptible to early or surprising exits. If a team’s success is tied heavily to one phase of the game and that phase fails them – or simply isn’t up to par – teams go home early. We have seen it with good offensive teams that lack defense:  2012 Broncos, 2011 Packers, endless Colts teams, etc. We have also seen it with good defensive teams that lack offense: Endless Ravens teams in the last 10 years, the Tony Dungy Buccaneers, etc. With that being said, I took a look at who are the most and least balanced teams in the 2013 playoffs. I took a look at the following 23 categories (8 offense, 7 defense, 8 special teams) and added up the team’s regular season rankings in all 23 categories.

 

Offense                                                                               Defense                                                               Special Teams

Yards Per Game                                                                Yards Per Game                                                                Net Punting

Passing YPG                                                        Passing YPG                                                        % of Punts Inside 20

Rushing YPG                                                       Rushing YPG                                                       Fair Catches Forced

Points Per Game                                              Points Allowed Per Game                            FG %

Giveaways                                                          Takeaways                                                          Kick Return Avg.

Turnover Differential                                     Sacks                                                                     Punt Return Avg.

Sacks Allowed                                                   3rd Down Conv. Allowed                                               KR Avg. Allowed

3rd Down Conversion %                                                                                                                 PR Avg. Allowed

 

Like golf, a low score is better (i.e. if a team was ranked #1 in the NFL in all 8 offensive categories, their Offensive Ranking would be 8). Here is what I found:

2013 AFC Playoff Team Rankings:

Overall Ranking
Off + Def Ranking
Offense Ranking
Defense Ranking
Sp Teams Ranking
1
Cin
246
1
Cin
126
1
Den
52
1
Cin
33
1
NE
86
2
NE
283
2
Den
172
2
SD
69
2
KC
89
2
KC
95
3
KC
290
3
KC
195
3
NE
72
3
Ind
109
3
Cin
120
4
Den
299
4
NE
197
4
Ind
91
4
Den
120
4
Den
127
5
SD
350
5
Ind
200
5
Cin
93
5
NE
125
5
SD
133
6
Ind
363
6
SD
217
6
KC
106
6
SD
148
6
Ind
163

 

In the AFC, the Bengals are the most balanced team and are far superior on defense than their AFC counterparts. In the AFC, we also see what we likely already knew - although the Broncos are clearly the top offensive team, their defense is extremely vulnerable. A more balanced team like the Bengals or Patriots have a decent shot against an unbalanced team like the Broncos.

 

2013 NFC Playoff Team Rankings:

Overall Ranking
Off + Def Ranking
Offense Ranking
Defense Ranking
Sp Teams Ranking
1
Sea
217
1
Sea
126
1
Phi
61
1
Sea
29
1
Sea
91
2
SF
253
2
Car
146
2
NO
77
2
Car
31
2
SF
102
3
Car
277
3
NO
148
3
GB
91
3
SF
48
3
Car
131
4
NO
297
4
SF
151
4
Sea
97
4
NO
71
3
Phi
131
5
Phi
327
5
Phi
196
5
SF
103
5
Phi
135
5
NO
149
6
GB
397
6
GB
235
6
Car
115
6
GB
144
6
GB
162

 

In the NFC, no surprise to see Seattle as the top overall team and top defense, but what is interesting is to see how average at best their offense is. If Seattle comes off the bye a bit rusty like we have seen many teams do in the past, a team that can put points up on them could cause them problems.

 

Are there holes in this ranking system? Absolutely. All rankings were given the same weight and team rankings don’t take into account recent injuries, recent returns from injury, where the game is played or the weather it is played in. Here are the holes/weakness/misleading aspects of each teams rankings:

 

AFC

1)      Cincinnati Bengals – The Bengals one weakness in the rankings was turnovers. The Bengals were ranked 25th in the regular season and had more turnovers than any other playoff team (30). Regardless of their other rankings, if the Bengals turn the ball over twice a game, they will likely lose. Also, the Bengals punting rankings are skewed with the late loss of Huber. Their punt rankings would likely be lower with their new punter.

 

2)      New England Patriots – The Patriots are 4th in terms of offense, but without Gronkowski, that is likely misleading and thereby skews their overall team ranking as well.

3)      Kansas City Chiefs – The Chiefs defensive scores does not accurately reflect how poor they have been playing at the end of the season with the injuries they have had on the defensive side of the ball.

 

4)      Denver Broncos – The Broncos defensive scores, though still poor, do not take into account the recent loss of Von Miller, meaning the Broncos overall balance is even less than what is currently being reflected.

 

5)      San Diego Chargers – The Chargers score doesn’t capture the sudden increase in production from their running game going into the season, nor does it account for a few healthy returns on the defensive side of the ball.

 

6)      Indianapolis Colts – The Colts score is likely pretty accurate as half of the season was played without Wayne, therefore their rankings have kind of adjusted to their current state.

 

NFC

1)      Seattle Seahawks – The Seahawks score is misleading as to their balance. Though they have the top score, they aren’t very balanced because the shear dominance of their defense hides their pedestrian offense. In the 7 defensive categories, the Seahawks were ranked 1st in 4 and had a total defensive score of just 29 points! Their offense, on the other hand, was mostly ranked in the teens to low twenties, meaning if a team can put up some points on the Seahawks, the Seahawks could find themselves in some trouble.

 

2)      San Francisco 49ers – The 49ers score was similar to the Seahawks in that their impressive defensive rankings hid their terrible passing attack (30th). However, in the 49ers defense, their 30th ranked passing attack is slightly skewed because it does not take into account the recent return of Crabtree.

 

3)      Carolina Panthers – The Panthers score should be fairly accurate because even though they lost Steve Smith late, he may be back for their first game, and even if not, their passing numbers were still pretty poor with him.

 

4)      New Orleans Saints – The Saints score should be pretty accurate as well seeing that they don’t have any big recent injuries or returns. The one aspect that their rankings do not account for is the drop in production away from home. Being away from home is the biggest imbalance with the Saints.

 

5)      Philadelphia Eagles – The Eagles score may be the most accurate (9th) as they are likely the most imbalanced team in the playoffs. A 2nd ranked offense paired with a 29th ranked defense is a recipe for playoff disaster and is the exact imbalance this scoring system was designed to expose. A lull in the Eagles offense will spell disaster.

 

6)      Green Bay Packers – Though the Packers are significantly better (as a team) with Rodgers, the return of Rodgers doesn’t do much to help their team balance, therefore seeing them as the lowest score is not surprising. Green Bay still had an offense ranked in the top 10 in nearly every category even with Rodgers missing significant time. The defense is the problem and with the injury to Matthews, likely will continue to be a problem.

 

 

So, what does it all mean? Well, it is a fancy way of coming to the conclusion that I think the Bengals and the Seahawks are the best overall teams in their respective conferences and I am picking the grand “Matchup in Manhattan” to be the Seattle Seahawks vs the Cincinnati Bengals.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

No comments:

Post a Comment