In the playoffs, one bad day can send a team packing and
teams that lack balance are far more susceptible to early or surprising exits.
If a team’s success is tied heavily to one phase of the game and that phase
fails them – or simply isn’t up to par – teams go home early. We have seen it
with good offensive teams that lack defense:
2012 Broncos, 2011 Packers, endless Colts teams, etc. We have also seen
it with good defensive teams that lack offense: Endless Ravens teams in the
last 10 years, the Tony Dungy Buccaneers, etc. With that being said, I took a
look at who are the most and least balanced teams in the 2013 playoffs. I took
a look at the following 23 categories (8 offense, 7 defense, 8 special teams)
and added up the team’s regular season rankings in all 23 categories.
Offense Defense Special Teams
Yards Per Game Yards
Per Game Net
Punting
Passing YPG Passing
YPG %
of Punts Inside 20
Rushing YPG Rushing
YPG Fair
Catches Forced
Points Per Game Points
Allowed Per Game FG
%
Giveaways Takeaways Kick
Return Avg.
Turnover Differential Sacks Punt
Return Avg.
Sacks Allowed 3rd
Down Conv. Allowed KR
Avg. Allowed
3rd Down Conversion % PR
Avg. Allowed
Like golf, a low score is better (i.e. if a team was ranked
#1 in the NFL in all 8 offensive categories, their Offensive Ranking would be
8). Here is what I found:
2013 AFC Playoff
Team Rankings:
Overall Ranking
|
Off + Def Ranking
|
Offense Ranking
|
Defense Ranking
|
Sp Teams Ranking
|
||||||||||||||
1
|
Cin
|
246
|
1
|
Cin
|
126
|
1
|
Den
|
52
|
1
|
Cin
|
33
|
1
|
NE
|
86
|
||||
2
|
NE
|
283
|
2
|
Den
|
172
|
2
|
SD
|
69
|
2
|
KC
|
89
|
2
|
KC
|
95
|
||||
3
|
KC
|
290
|
3
|
KC
|
195
|
3
|
NE
|
72
|
3
|
Ind
|
109
|
3
|
Cin
|
120
|
||||
4
|
Den
|
299
|
4
|
NE
|
197
|
4
|
Ind
|
91
|
4
|
Den
|
120
|
4
|
Den
|
127
|
||||
5
|
SD
|
350
|
5
|
Ind
|
200
|
5
|
Cin
|
93
|
5
|
NE
|
125
|
5
|
SD
|
133
|
||||
6
|
Ind
|
363
|
6
|
SD
|
217
|
6
|
KC
|
106
|
6
|
SD
|
148
|
6
|
Ind
|
163
|
In the AFC, the Bengals are the most balanced team and are
far superior on defense than their AFC counterparts. In the AFC, we also see
what we likely already knew - although the Broncos are clearly the top
offensive team, their defense is extremely vulnerable. A more balanced team
like the Bengals or Patriots have a decent shot against an unbalanced team like
the Broncos.
2013 NFC Playoff
Team Rankings:
Overall Ranking
|
Off + Def Ranking
|
Offense Ranking
|
Defense Ranking
|
Sp Teams Ranking
|
||||||||||||||
1
|
Sea
|
217
|
1
|
Sea
|
126
|
1
|
Phi
|
61
|
1
|
Sea
|
29
|
1
|
Sea
|
91
|
||||
2
|
SF
|
253
|
2
|
Car
|
146
|
2
|
NO
|
77
|
2
|
Car
|
31
|
2
|
SF
|
102
|
||||
3
|
Car
|
277
|
3
|
NO
|
148
|
3
|
GB
|
91
|
3
|
SF
|
48
|
3
|
Car
|
131
|
||||
4
|
NO
|
297
|
4
|
SF
|
151
|
4
|
Sea
|
97
|
4
|
NO
|
71
|
3
|
Phi
|
131
|
||||
5
|
Phi
|
327
|
5
|
Phi
|
196
|
5
|
SF
|
103
|
5
|
Phi
|
135
|
5
|
NO
|
149
|
||||
6
|
GB
|
397
|
6
|
GB
|
235
|
6
|
Car
|
115
|
6
|
GB
|
144
|
6
|
GB
|
162
|
In the NFC, no surprise to see Seattle as the top overall
team and top defense, but what is interesting is to see how average at best
their offense is. If Seattle comes off the bye a bit rusty like we have seen
many teams do in the past, a team that can put points up on them could cause
them problems.
Are there holes in this ranking system? Absolutely. All
rankings were given the same weight and team rankings don’t take into account
recent injuries, recent returns from injury, where the game is played or the
weather it is played in. Here are the holes/weakness/misleading aspects of each
teams rankings:
AFC
1)
Cincinnati
Bengals – The Bengals one weakness in the rankings was turnovers. The
Bengals were ranked 25th in the regular season and had more
turnovers than any other playoff team (30). Regardless of their other rankings,
if the Bengals turn the ball over twice a game, they will likely lose. Also,
the Bengals punting rankings are skewed with the late loss of Huber. Their punt
rankings would likely be lower with their new punter.
2)
New
England Patriots – The Patriots are 4th in terms of offense, but
without Gronkowski, that is likely misleading and thereby skews their overall
team ranking as well.
3)
Kansas
City Chiefs – The Chiefs defensive scores does not accurately reflect how
poor they have been playing at the end of the season with the injuries they
have had on the defensive side of the ball.
4)
Denver
Broncos – The Broncos defensive scores, though still poor, do not take into
account the recent loss of Von Miller, meaning the Broncos overall balance is
even less than what is currently being reflected.
5)
San Diego
Chargers – The Chargers score doesn’t capture the sudden increase in
production from their running game going into the season, nor does it account
for a few healthy returns on the defensive side of the ball.
6)
Indianapolis
Colts – The Colts score is likely pretty accurate as half of the season was
played without Wayne, therefore their rankings have kind of adjusted to their
current state.
NFC
1)
Seattle
Seahawks – The Seahawks score is misleading as to their balance. Though
they have the top score, they aren’t very balanced because the shear dominance
of their defense hides their pedestrian offense. In the 7 defensive categories,
the Seahawks were ranked 1st in 4 and had a total defensive score of
just 29 points! Their offense, on the other hand, was mostly ranked in the
teens to low twenties, meaning if a team can put up some points on the
Seahawks, the Seahawks could find themselves in some trouble.
2)
San
Francisco 49ers – The 49ers score was similar to the Seahawks in that their
impressive defensive rankings hid their terrible passing attack (30th).
However, in the 49ers defense, their 30th ranked passing attack is
slightly skewed because it does not take into account the recent return of
Crabtree.
3)
Carolina
Panthers – The Panthers score should be fairly accurate because even though
they lost Steve Smith late, he may be back for their first game, and even if
not, their passing numbers were still pretty poor with him.
4)
New
Orleans Saints – The Saints score should be pretty accurate as well seeing
that they don’t have any big recent injuries or returns. The one aspect that
their rankings do not account for is the drop in production away from home.
Being away from home is the biggest imbalance with the Saints.
5)
Philadelphia
Eagles – The Eagles score may be the most accurate (9th) as they
are likely the most imbalanced team in the playoffs. A 2nd ranked
offense paired with a 29th ranked defense is a recipe for playoff
disaster and is the exact imbalance this scoring system was designed to expose.
A lull in the Eagles offense will spell disaster.
6)
Green Bay
Packers – Though the Packers are significantly better (as a team) with
Rodgers, the return of Rodgers doesn’t do much to help their team balance,
therefore seeing them as the lowest score is not surprising. Green Bay still
had an offense ranked in the top 10 in nearly every category even with Rodgers
missing significant time. The defense is the problem and with the injury to
Matthews, likely will continue to be a problem.
So, what does it all mean? Well, it is a fancy way of coming
to the conclusion that I think the Bengals and the Seahawks are the best
overall teams in their respective conferences and I am picking the grand
“Matchup in Manhattan” to be the Seattle Seahawks vs the Cincinnati Bengals.
No comments:
Post a Comment