With the NFL free agency period starting exactly one month
from today (March 11th), let’s take a look at the Bengals that have
the potential to hit the open market and evaluate whether the Bengals should
re-sign them and what the Bengals chances are to re-sign them. Below are the 15
Bengals players that either become Unrestricted Free Agents (UFA) or Restricted
Free Agents (RFA) on March 11th.
|
RFA / UFA
|
Player
|
Pos
|
Analysis
|
Should Bengals Re-sign?
|
Chances to re-sign
|
1
|
UFA
|
Michael Johnson
|
DE
|
I love Michael Johnson
the player. I love Michael Johnson the person. I don't love the money Michael
Johnson is going to command. While Johnson did not have the big numbers in
2013, he is still a top DE with plenty left in the tank and he will get big
money offers. The Bengals could afford to keep either MJ or Dunlap. They
chose Dunlap. I would love him back, but with Dunlap, Gilberry, Hunt, etc, I
expect the Bengals to let Johnson walk.
|
No
|
10/90
|
2
|
UFA
|
Anthony Collins
|
OT
|
I have always liked
Collins and thought the Bengals line really took a step forward last year
when Collins went to LT and Whitworth moved to LG. I don't know if the
Bengals are open to keeping Whit at LG full time, but they should be. While I
wouldn't break the bank for Collins, if $5-6M would be enough to get him
signed, I would bring him back and move Whit to LG permanently.
|
Yes
|
50/50
|
3
|
UFA
|
Taylor Mays
|
S
|
I have never been a big
fan of Mays, but to his credit, he played well last year in his role as a
nickel LB and it is because of that versatility that I think the Bengals
should try to bring him back. With his low NFL production and season ending
injury, bringing him back shouldn't be hard or expensive.
|
Yes
|
80/20
|
4
|
UFA
|
Chris Crocker
|
S
|
The last two years Chris
Crocker has come off his couch to stablize the Bengals secondary and been
very productive doing so. Much like they did in 2012 and 2013, I see the
Bengals letting Crocker walk, knowing that he will be there should they need
him later in the year.
|
No
|
10/90
|
5
|
UFA
|
Brandon Tate
|
WR
|
Tate had a decent year,
but nothing that can't be replaced by a younger and less expensive option.
Letting Tate walk could save me a few four letter outbursts per Sunday - a
welcomed thought.
|
No
|
50/50
|
6
|
UFA
|
Brandon Ghee
|
CB
|
Ghee always draws rave
reviews…and is always injured. As a result of his injuries, I don't expect
him to get many looks outside of the Bengals and he will be available for
cheap. He is worth bringing back to see if he can stay healthy and finally be
the player we hear about, but his roster spot will be far from a lock.
|
Yes
|
80/20
|
7
|
UFA
|
Mike Pollak
|
OG
|
I thought Pollak did a
very good job last year filling in for Zietler and at times, I thought he
outperformed Zietler. I would be all for bringing Pollak back in 2014 as a
strong and versatile lineman, but the Bengals have other young lineman
(Hawkinson) that they like as well.
|
Yes
|
50/50
|
8
|
UFA
|
Alex Smith
|
TE
|
Smith played more than
the average 3rd TE, but he produced at the level you would expect for a 3rd
TE…very little. I see the Bengals letting him walk and keeping Gresham,
Eifert and Charles.
|
No
|
10/90
|
9
|
UFA
|
Dennis Roland
|
OT
|
Letting him go brings up
the big question of "who fills the tackle eligible role?" However,
barring injury, I see Roland being free for lunch dates come September.
|
No
|
5/95
|
10
|
UFA
|
Zoltan Mesko
|
P
|
If Huber is healthy, the
Bengals have their Punter. If not, they certainly could bring back Mesko who
fills two roles - Punter and Speedo model!
|
No
|
1/99
|
11
|
UFA
|
Michael Boley
|
LB
|
There is never a 0%
chance for a player returning, but Boley is as close to 0% as one could get.
With Burfict, Maualuga, Harrison, a healthy Lamur, Porter and Mays ( and
presuming they bring back Vincent Rey), Boley has no spot and serves no
purpose…not much unlike he did in 2013.
|
No
|
1/99
|
12
|
UFA
|
Ogemdi Nwagbo
|
DT
|
Who? Exactly. He filled
the roster spot when Still went on IR, but assuming Still is healthy and Peko
isn't released, he doesn't have a spot on the 2014 team.
|
No
|
5/95
|
13
|
RFA
|
Andrew Hawkins
|
WR
|
With his quickness and
agility, Hawkins provides an additional element to the offense and makes the
offense tougher to defend. I think the Bengals want him back, and as a RFA,
they will have the opportunity to match any offers. However, if someone
offers him big money (doubtful), I don't see the Bengals matching it (nor
should they).
|
Yes
|
70/30
|
14
|
RFA
|
Vincent Rey
|
LB
|
Rey was a pleasant
surprise in 2013 and I would argue the 2nd best LB on the team. I think the
Bengals realize his value and will bring him back on a 2-3 year deal for
starter/high paid backup money. It isn't out of the realm of possibity that
Rey starts in 2014.
|
Yes
|
90/10
|
15
|
RFA
|
Dane Sanzenbacher
|
WR
|
I think the Bengals would
like to bring back Sanzenbacher and his limited playing time in 2013 likely
makes his return more of a possibility. Sanzenbacher is a sure handed
receiver that can return punts and be a great insurance policy against an
injury.
|
Yes
|
60/40
|
No comments:
Post a Comment