12
oz Power Rankings
| ||||
Rank
|
Team
|
Record
|
Comment
|
Previous
|
1
|
Broncos
|
7-1
|
On
bye and no one wanted to take their spot.
|
1
|
2
|
Chiefs
|
9-0
|
9-0
but 1 win against a team with a winning record (Dal 5-4). Very unimpressive
in close wins the last 3 weeks (Buf, Cle, Hou).
|
3
|
3
|
49ers
|
6-2
|
Another
benefit of the bye week and teams at the top sucking.
|
6
|
4
|
Patriots
|
7-2
|
The
Patriots have not been healthy and they are 7-2 with their only losses coming
to NYJ and Cin. Now, they are getting healthy.
|
10
|
5
|
Saints
|
6-2
|
Falling
to a team that lost the previous week by 40 (NYJ) brings your team into
question.
|
2
|
6
|
Seahawks
|
8-1
|
After
being behind all game to a terrible TB team and their enormous struggles on
the road, the Seahawks are looking shaky.
|
5
|
7
|
Bengals
|
6-3
|
Maybe
they started believing all the hype they were getting. The loss of Atkins
hurts big time.
|
7
|
8
|
Colts
|
6-2
|
A
comeback win, but against a really bad Texans team. If not for the Kubiak
situation, the Colts lose that game.
|
8
|
9
|
Lions
|
5-3
|
The
Lions have Calvin Johnson. The Bears and Packers have injured QBs.
|
9
|
10
|
Panthers
|
5-3
|
Newton
might be figuring things out in the NFL.
|
11
|
11
|
Cardinals
|
4-4
|
The
Cardinals have weapons on offensive and a worthy defense. 3 of the 4 losses
are to Sea, NO, SF (combined 19-4).
|
12
|
12
|
Bears
|
5-3
|
McCown
was impressive and the defense is still strong.
|
15
|
13
|
Packers
|
5-3
|
Without
Rodgers, this is a suspect roster. Without Rodgers, Cobb, Finley and
Matthews, the Packers may be in trouble.
|
4
|
14
|
Cowboys
|
5-4
|
They
are over .500 but far from good.
|
14
|
15
|
Titans
|
4-4
|
If
Chris Johnson is back, the Titans can be a playoff contender.
|
16
|
16
|
Chargers
|
4-4
|
You
just can't trust this team. They just have the looks of an "around .500
team"…just with a new coach
|
13
|
17
|
Jets
|
5-4
|
I
put them here very reluctantly. 5-4 after 9 games is roughly 4-5 more wins
than I thought they would have at this point. Give them credit.
|
22
|
18
|
Dolphins
|
4-4
|
They
beat the Bengals, but did not look impressive doing so…oh yeah, and they have
managed to become the circus in a
division that has the Jets.
|
18
|
19
|
Ravens
|
3-5
|
Did
Joe Flacco sign a new contract or win a lottery ticket? It could be up for
debate.
|
17
|
20
|
Browns
|
4-5
|
They
beat the Ravens, but I just can't rank this team above last years Super Bowl
champs yet.
|
23
|
21
|
Eagles
|
4-5
|
7
TDs on the West Coast against a defense that was supposed to be good is
impressive. They are also 0-4 at home?
|
29
|
22
|
Redskins
|
3-5
|
They
are playing better and may just have enough time to make a run in the worst
division in football.
|
25
|
23
|
Bills
|
3-6
|
The
Bills are a pleasant surprise that gave the Chiefs all they could handle. A
good defense and an underrated offense.
|
20
|
24
|
Giants
|
2-6
|
Despite
being 2-6 and an innate ability to give the ball to the opposing team, they
still have a a shot at the division.
|
24
|
25
|
Rams
|
3-6
|
Kellen
Clemens has filled in admirably, but this team was a below .500 team with
it's starting QB.
|
19
|
26
|
Raiders
|
3-5
|
The
Raiders may have been exposed as a fraud by the immortal Nick Foles and his
4-5 Eagles.
|
21
|
27
|
Falcons
|
2-6
|
I
saw the Falcons taking a step back this year. 2-6 at the midway point is not
what I was thinking.
|
28
|
28
|
Texans
|
2-6
|
Amazing
to think this team may be done 8 games into the season.
|
26
|
29
|
Steelers
|
2-6
|
See
the Falcons analysis and change the name to the Steelers.
|
27
|
30
|
Vikings
|
1-7
|
The
Vikings had life against the Cowboys. Not enough to save a terrible season -
or to win the game for that matter
|
30
|
31
|
Buccaneers
|
0-8
|
Nearly
won in the most difficult venue in sports….nearly. Schiano might want to
focus his long nights on his resume rather than game film.
|
31
|
32
|
Jaguars
|
0-8
|
Are
they the worst NFL team or the best amateur team? Does it matter?
|
32
|
Wednesday, November 6, 2013
Power Rankings - Week 9
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment