Wednesday, March 13, 2013

Deep Breath Bengals Fans!



Chubs in Happy Gilmore used to talk about “just easin the tension baby!” Well Bengals fans, I am writing this to help “just ease the tension baby!”

Would you rather be the team that wins the first few days of free agency or the team that consistently wins games? When was the last time a team that “won the offseason” even made the playoffs? Remember the Redskins when they signed Hayneworth? They won the offseason. Remember the Eagles just a few years ago? Asomugha, DRC, Vick, etc. According to Vince Young, they were a Dream Team. I don’t recall teams not making the playoffs being considered Dream Teams. How did the $100 million deal for Mario Williams work for the Bills? The Texans went to the playoffs as a 3 seed and the Bills watched from home. Take a look around at big first day signings - they are usually big first day cuts a few years down the road (see Asomugha). Good teams and successful organizations are not built through free agency, they are built through the draft (even though the 800 “experts” working 24/7 at ESPN and the NFL Network seem to still be unaware of this). Quick, who would you rattle off as the model organizations known for long periods of success and short down times? Steelers, Patriots, Giants, Green Bay, Baltimore (though with the Flacco signing, they may have jumped the shark). Name the last big free agent any of those teams signed (not one of their own). I will keep writing while you think. These organizations have a history of drafting strong, not overpaying for free agents (their own or other teams), and using free agency to fill holes with solid players at reasonable prices. They also build around a core group of players and let high priced non-core players leave (see Mike Wallace, James Harrison, Santonio Holmes, Plaxico Burress, Ty Law, Asante Samuel, Randy Moss, Richard Seymour, etc, etc, etc.).  Did you think of a big signing by these teams yet? No? I will keep writing.

The first day of free agency is like buying new technology the day it comes out. Raise your hand if you do that? Remember when the plasma tv first came out? They were about $4,000-5,000 for a plasma tv which now costs $600. They also had lower picture resolution, less of a true black, and issues with burnout and breakdown. You mean you didn’t wait in lines hundreds deep for that? You didn’t want to overpay for a shiny headache? What!? Why not? You waited until the price came down and they worked out the kinks didn’t you? You are an idiot! Welcome to the first 3 days of free agency, where spoiled, clueless billionaires believe money can solve their issues and money can buy winning. Wanna bet the Dolphins fail to make the playoffs? I will. By the way, the Dolphins have spent all this money yet have not re-signed one of the best LTs in the game, Jake Long. In order to take advantage of the one route Wallace can run (the go route), Tannehill needs to have time. Without Long, who is going to make sure Tannehill is not dead?

Still jealous of the other team’s shiny new toys? Imagine this: imagine if I told you the Bengals just signed a WR for $13 million who was 34th in receiving yards in 2012 and is prone to drops? You would be happy right? No, you would laugh yourself to death at Mike Brown’s ineptitude. See Mike Wallace (836 yds, 55.7 yds/game). Imagine I told you the Bengals just paid $7million/year for a MLB who has been a backup his whole career, started 7 games last year only because of an injury in front of him, and has 142 career tackles over his 4 year career. Again, you would cry laughing at how stupid the Bengals are. See Dannell Ellerbe. The point is this, spending for the sake of spending does not get success, it gets high priced public humiliation. It means trying to buy square pegs for round holes. Football is a game built on systems. Players fit systems. A player can be wildly successful for one team (when in a system that fits him) and terrible in a system that doesn’t fit him. Look at TJ Houshmanzadeh. How do you think guys like Tom Brady, Terrell Davis, James Harrison, etc come from nowhere to be stars? They talented players who are in systems which play to their abilities.


Sure, the Bengals have tons of money to spend (just like the Dolphins), but the Bengals also have a ton of core players of their own that need to be resigned. Reports had the Bengals with around $50 million in cap space this year, but that is deceiving because of all their own players that need to be re-signed. Laugh all you want at the Bengals re-signing a K, P, and long snapper, but they didn’t dish out huge money on them and you only notice these guys when they mess up. When was the last time you cursed a kick, a punt, or a snap? Therefore, they are doing their jobs and are valuable.  Andre Smith and Adam Jones need to still be brought back. Michael Johnson was franchised ($11 million+). What about Newman? What about Hawkins? Geno Atkins is up for FA next year. Do you let him become a FA or lock him up now? Dunlap and MJ will be FAs next year. Do you lock up one or both now? AJ Green will come due in 2 years, would you lock him up now or wait? The Bengals have 8 picks in 2013, they are included in that cap space as well. Now take a look at the Bengals $50 million and tell me what is left? It is simple math. You can’t sign all of those guys as well as guys from other teams. Which of those listed above are you letting walk for a current FA? Who out there improves this team without strapping the team financially? They can’t (nor should they) afford to drop $5-7 million on a safety. No safety is worth that. Heck, the Bengals have made a huge leap in the division simply by doing nothing. Baltimore has lost: Ray Lewis, Ellerbe, Krueger, Pollard, Boldin, Birk, and possibly Reed. The Steelers have lost: Wallace, Colon, Mendenhall, Harrison, and possibly Hampton. The Browns had a bad offense and signed a couple defensive players…and are still the Browns. So you tell me, who has won so far in the AFC North?

So, Bengals fans, grab my hand and step away from the cliff. Let the undisciplined spenders blow their money on overpriced players, then fill a few holes with quality players and locker room guys at good prices. I know we are not used to it, but that is how the successful teams do it, and say what you want about their post season success, they have made it to the playoffs 3 of the last 4 years. Few teams can say that.  

Prior to signing any other team’s players, the Bengals priorities should be their own in the following order:

  1. Andre Smith
  2. Adam Jones
  3. Extend Atkins


Once these are done the Bengals can look outside. Here is the positional breakdown and who might be worthwhile to take a look at:

Backup QB
The Bengals lost Gradkowski to Pittsburgh. Losing him doesn’t hurt, however, I don’t like having a backup QB going to a division rival.

Potential fits for backup QB:

  • Ryan Fitzpatrick
  • Jason Campbell
  • Matt Cassell
  • Vince Young
  • Rex Grossman
  • Brady Quinn


RB
The bulk of the improvement at the RB position will come via the draft. Expect the Bengals to add 2 RBs, either 1 by draft and 1 by FA, or 2 by the draft.

Potential fits for RB:

  • Steven Jackson – may be a pipe dream, but for 1 year and under $4 million, I would do sign him.
  • Mike Goodson – good back up and spot starter
  • Beanie Wells – when healthy (a big assumption), he is a pretty good RB. At a low cost, he is worth the risk


#2 WR
I don’t see the Bengals signing a WR in FA. Reason? Sanu and Jones. If they do, don’t fool yourself with Jennings – they won’t sign him (nor should they).

Potential fits for #2 WR


  • Darrius Heyward-Bey
  • Laurent Robinson


OL
Other than Smith, not needed

DE
No thank you.

DT
No thank you

CB
There are some big names on the market, but none that are upgrades at this point in their careers. I believe the Bengals will re-sign Jones and Newman and not any other CBs.

S
Sure the Bengals need a safety and there are some decent ones out there, however, spending big money on a safety could be devastating.

LB
Yes the Bengals need to address the LB position, but they likely will in the draft and they need not overspend. I hope Rey leaves and from there, would rank my desire for LB as follows:

Potential LB fits:

  • Spikes – old, but is reliable and consistent
  • Thomas Howard – I like Howard and would bring him back
  • DJ Williams
  • Conner Barwin
  • Karlos Dansby


So again Bengals fans, take a deep breath, relax, take my hand, and step away from the cliff. I know this is tough to believe as a Bengals fan, but I think Mike and company have finally figured out how to build a successful organization, and it is not through free agency.

Tuesday, March 12, 2013

Reviewing Reds Offseason Moves


Days are getting longer, weather is getting better, spring training has begun, and sports watching is about to go through the roof! We are preparing to enter what I consider the best 3 month stretch in the sporting year. Over the next 3 months, we will have NFL free agency begin, NCAA conference tournaments, Selection Sunday, the NCAA tournament itself, MLB Opening Day, NBA playoffs, and my personal favorite, the presentation of the Stanley Cup. People talk about this being the busy time for accountants, but what about bloggers? I am currently preparing the staff for the busy season, loading up on midnight oil, Cheetos, Monster energy drinks, and preparing my Mom for the constant hum of the keyboard that will be coming from her basement!
Before the madness begins, I want to get into the top two Reds offseason stories which we have yet to discuss because of the NFL season … and slacking by my staff: 1) Choo for Stubbs and 2) Chapman in the rotation.

Choo for Stubbs

Yay or Nay?

Big time Yay.

 



What I like about the deal:

Everything.
I never sugarcoated my feelings for Drew Stubbs. I didn’t like Drew Stubbs. I didn’t like his baseball IQ. I didn’t like his knowledge of the strikezone. I didn’t like his approach at the plate. I didn’t like his inability to bunt. I didn’t like his inability to make contact and take advantage of his one tool, his speed. I didn’t like his reluctance to steal when he did get on base. I didn’t like his body language. And, despite what many said about his defense, I think he is an average CF who happens to have above average speed. What I also didn’t like about Stubbs was the fact that he was Dusty Baker’s vice. He had speed, and with Baker, if you have speed, whether you can hit or not (and Stubbs clearly could not), you must lead off (see Wily Taveras and Corey Patterson for other Baker examples). Baker still believes you can steal first base if you are fast enough. I disagree and have stats, history, and common sense on my side. A leadoff hitters’ job is twofold: 1) make the pitcher show you a lot of pitches so your teammates can see what he has, and 2) get on base any way you can – hit, walk, error, HBP (ala Bill Dorn), etc. Stubbs did neither. 

My biggest issue with Stubbs was his ability to render the best hitter in baseball (Votto) less effective because of his inability to get on base in front of Votto. Joey Votto is best hitter in all of baseball. He is also as close as it gets to a sure thing when it comes to RBIs. His stats in 2012 did not reflect this (14 HR, 56 RBI), but that is because he didn’t have runners on base in front of him (and injury). Take a look at Votto’s numbers:
Situation
AB
HR
RBI
BB
AVG
OBP
OPS
Bases Empty
218
5
5
45
.326
.445
.936
Runners On
156
9
51
49
.353
.510
1.183
RISP
73
7
41
33
.370
.560
1.341
Bases Loaded
4
1
6
0
.500
.500
1.750
He bats an impressive .326 with the bases empty. .353 with runners on. And .370 with RISP! All better than AL MVP and Triple Crown winner Miquel Cabrera. 

In fact, look at how Votto stacks up against the top hitters (and recent MVPs) in both leagues:

Situation: Bases Empty                                                        Situation: Runners On

AVG
OBP
OPS
Joey Votto
.326
.445
.936
Miquel Cabrera
.320
.382
1.004
Ryan Braun
.311
.367
.954
Albert Pujols
.269
.307
..810
Josh Hamilton
.267
.327
..864

AVG
OBP
OPS
Joey Votto
.353
.510
1.183
Miquel Cabrera
.340
.405
.993
Ryan Braun
.331
.422
1.029
Josh Hamilton
.308
.386
1.014
Albert Pujols
.304
.384
.915

Situation: RISP                                                                         Situation: Bases Loaded

AVG
OBP
OPS
 Joey Votto        
.370
.560
1.341
Miquel Cabrera
.356
.424
1.004
Ryan Braun
.307
.429
.962
Josh Hamilton
.296
.392
.925
Albert Pujols
.281
.383
.896

AVG
OBP
OPS
Joey Votto
.500
.500
1.750
Miquel Cabrera
.273
.267
.812
Josh Hamilton
.222
.273
.495
Albert Pujols
.200
.200
.400
Ryan Braun
.083
.143
.310

Sure, Votto’s numbers are a little deceiving because he only had about 2/3 the ABs as the other candidates, but all of these numbers are averages, and averages are averages, especially when you still have 374 ABs. Of the 12 categories, Votto is #1 in 11 of the 12 (by the way, Cabrera won the Triple Crown last year).

Not surprising - when you take a great hitter like Votto, move the pitcher into the stretch and distract him with a runner, Votto gets even better. Drew Stubbs failure to get on base rendered Votto less effective. In 2012, 58% of Votto’s plate appearances came with the bases empty. That is not good. For comparison, Cabrera and Hamilton were 1 and 2 in RBIs in MLB in 2012 with 139 and 128 respectively. Cabrera batted with the bases empty just 53% of the time, while Hamilton 56%. Chase Headley lead the NL with 115 RBIs. He came to the plate with the bases empty just 54% of the time (Braun and Pujols were at 57% and 55% respectively). 

Enter Shin-Soo Choo. Choo gets on base (.373 OBP) and has speed (21 SB). He gives the Reds their first legitimate lead-off hitter since……Deion Sanders? Take a look at the numbers:


AB
H
2B
3B
HR
RBI
BB
SO
SB
AVG
OBP
SLG
OPS
Stubbs
493
105
13
2
14
40
42
166
30
.213
.277
.333
.610
Choo
598
169
43
2
16
67
73
150
21
.283
.373
.441
.814

If Choo has a similar year, that means he will be on base 50-60 more times than Stubbs. That also means BP will be on base more (as he also hits better with runners on). That means that Choo’s presence could mean as many as 100+ extra base runners for Votto. Last year Votto knocked in 56% of the runners in scoring position, meaning Choo’s presence could give Votto 30-50 more RBIs. And keep in mind, Choo’s numbers were put up despite being the best hitter on his Cleveland team. The second best player in his lineup was Asdrubal Cabrera (.273). The Reds feature 5 guys in there lineup who hit .273 or better (BP, Votto, Ludwick, Hanigan, and Frazier), and Jay Bruce. Choo will see more pitches to hit, and therefore, we should see Choo’s good numbers be even better. Choo went 4-4 in a spring game this week. Yes, it was spring training, but Stubbs has had 4 hits in a game exactly 1 time in his career (7/31/11 against SF). Choo had two 4 hit games last year alone.

What I don’t like about the deal:

That this deal (or one like it) didn’t happen prior to last year.

What shocked me about the deal?

The amount of Reds fans that seem to be against it. I would have traded Drew Stubbs for a box of baseballs and a fungo bat and considered it a victory. To get Choo is a steal. Is he a 1 year player? Likely. But that is because Billy Hamilton will likely be the lead-off man and CF in 2014 – again, win for the Reds. Add a guy like Choo to a 97 win team and that is a big deal. Choo had 27 more RBIs than Stubbs and likely will result in another 20-30 RBIs between BP and Votto. Imagine what a 97 win team could do with 30-40 more runs?
You want to throw Stubbs defense at me? Is his defense as good as Stubbs? I have not seen him play the field, but likely not. However, is it 30-40 runs worse than Stubbs? I can assure you it isn’t. Stubbs WAR (Wins Above Replacement) in 2012 was -0.2! WAR measures the value of the player compared to a replacement minor league player (or bench player). That means the Reds would have been better off with a minor leaguer! Whether you agree with WAR and Sabermetrics, you can agree with me that 0.2 is bad. For comparison, Choo was 3.1…and by the way, WAR takes defense into account.
Others don’t like it because the Reds gave up infield prospect Didi Gregorious. Have you seen Gregorious play? If your answer is no, you are excused from the argument to begin with. Keep in mind, Gregorious is a prospect. Prospect means they have proven nothing at the major league level. Remember how up in arms Reds fans were because the Reds gave up 2 pitching prospects for an old third basemen named Scott Rolen? Reds fans were beside themselves. Remember the pitchers names? No? Josh Roenicke and Zach Stewart. Roenicke is now a reliever for the Rockies and has a career 4.09 ERA (though he did have a 3.25 ERA in 2012 in 63 appearances). Stewart is a career 6.82 pitcher, including a 22.24 ERA in 2 starts last year with Boston. So, 4 years later, would you rather have had Rolen or Roenicke and Stewart? Gregorious has a great glove and is a promising prospect, but he is a prospect nonetheless. A prospect that hit .243 last year in AAA. Prospects are like businesses: way less than 50% succeed (remember: Willie Greene? Brandon Claussen? Brandon Larson? Austin Kearns? – all top Reds prospects who did nothing). Also, were you planning on replacing Cozart with Gregorious? Frazier? Phillips? If you are complaining about trading Gregorious, I would ask you where was he going to play? And, if he wasn’t going to play for 5 years, why keep him?

What will we be saying 5-10 years down the road on this deal?

Great trade. Even if Gregorious turns into Derek Jeter, this is a good trade. The Reds are built to win now. Choo is a know asset that helps now and fills a much needed hole (leadoff). Choo helps them win now. Gregorious does not.


Chapman in the Rotation

I can’t wait. The outrage of some fans and “experts” on this is typical of fans that want to complain about everything and reporters who want to create a story rather than cover a story. Weigh the Pros vs the Cons:


Pros for having Chapman in the rotation (in no particular order):

1) Move him back to his natural position – That is right folks. Aroldis Chapman has been a starter his entire life – and pretty damn good at it. And he would have been in the rotation last year had it not been for a plethora of injuries in the Reds bullpen (Madson, Masset, and Brey). He was a starter in Cuba (24-19 with a 3.67 ERA) as an 18 year old. He was a starter in Louisville (9-6 with a 3.57 ERA – 2010) at the age of 22. He was also a starter last spring and was the Reds best and most dominant pitcher in spring (2.12 ERA in 17.0 innings).   

2) Ability to dominate a game, not just an inning Closer is the most overrated position in baseball. What good is a closer if you don’t have the lead? Remember how bad we thought Coco Cordero was? For his career with the Reds, his save percentage was 86.2% (86% in 2011). Aroldis Chapman was far better right? He saved like 95% of his chances right? Wrong. 88.4%. Cordero blew one more game in 2011 than Chapman did in 2012 (both had 43 opportunities). That means the Reds would have won 96 games in 2012 rather than 97. They also would have been the 2 seed in the NL rather than the…2 seed. See my point? Sure Chapman was more dominant in his one inning than Cordero, but the numbers show they were both about as effective.

                   2a) Remember the dominant closer of the Braves in the 90’s or the fear of the 
                          Phillies closer in the 2010 season? Sure you don’t. You remember their starting 
                          rotations, not their closers. 

3) Rotation, Rotation, Rotation! – What sounds better:Option 1:Cueto, Latos, Bailey, Arroyo, Leake (all righties) with Chapman as the closer Option 2: Cueto, Latos, Chapman, Bailey, Arroyo with Broxton closing The answer is option 2. If you need convincing, I give up. 

4) Jonathan Broxton – Is he as good and dominant as Chapman? No. But, he is a good closer. 2.82 ERA, 1.03 WHIP, and 27 saves between KC and Cincinnati in 2012.  27 saves is more saves than 2 playoff teams closers (Oak and WS Champion SF). Who is a better replacement for Chapman: Broxton in the closer role? Or Leake in the rotation 

5) Money – Like it or not, money plays a role in these decisions. In 2010, the Reds signed Chapman for 6 years and $30.25 million. That sort of money on an unknown is only worth while on a starter, not a closer. Closers are luxuries. The Reds are not able to stay competitive with high priced closers. 

6) Lefty in the rotation – When was the last lefty in the Reds rotation? More importantly, when is the last legitimate, let alone dominant lefty the Reds had in their rotation? Pete Schourek circa 1995? 

7) Making the right decision, not the easy decision – Good organizations are good because they make the right decisions, not the easy decisions. Chapman was a very successful closer. Has the potential to be the best closer. Keeping him in that role would have been the easy decision. Moving him opens them up to criticism and failure. However, he can also be a dominant starter and Chapman is a starter and that’s what they brought him here to be. The Reds stuck to their guns and went against what the fans and “experts” were telling them to do. 

8) Arm issues – Chapman has proven that he can lose his effectiveness and velocity when pitching multiple days in a row. Without his velocity, he is not the same pitcher. As a starter, he will throw less pitches (when you take into account warming up) and will allow his arm to rest 4 days between each appearance. As a closer, he may have 4 or 5 days without rest. When this happens, he has shown that he can suffer from shoulder fatigue. For a guy that throws as hard as Chapman, pitching multiple days in a row will always be an issue…an issue that is not present if he is a starter.



Cons of moving Chapman to the rotation:
I don’t buy any of these, but here are the possibilities.

1) Why fix what is not broken – Chapman took the league by storm last year as one of, if not the most, dominant closers the league has seen. With the exception of a short period in the middle of the season, Chapman was unhittable. Rebuttal: He was also unproven as a closer last year and succeeded in that role. 

2) He can affect 60+ games rather than just 30 – A closer can affect more games than a starter. As a closer, Chapman could come in 60+ times. As a starter, he will only see 25-30 starts. Rebuttal: As a closer he only gets to affect games when the team is winning. A guy like Chapman can put them in a position to win more often than Mike Leake can. 

3) He is not proven as a starter – This is actually false. See above. Rebuttal: He is more proven as a starter than he was a closer. 

4) They will ruin his career – I would ask how? If simply putting him in the rotation ruins his career, he was never destined to be great then. 

5) What if it fails? – Who cares? You will never know if you never try. If it fails, does that mean it was the wrong decision? Sure as hell doesn’t. Fear of failure is not a reason not to move him. If he proves he can’t start, he can always go back to the bullpen.

Reds fans will be debating these two offseason moves all year, and rightfully so, but before we judge whether it was a success or failure, let’s give it a chance to play out. I hope in October I get to come back with the ultimate “I told you so!”