Earlier this year I
had the audacity to brush up against Superman’s cape and was bombarded with
texts, tweets, ridicule, FB comments, etc. about how I hate Votto. I stand by
what I said, and in fact, I believe I am currently being proven correct (the
success of this team mirrors Votto’s offensive dominance). My last article
inspired Votto to go on a terror in the month of May, batting .388 and sparking
the Reds to a 19-8 May record (11 over .500). Well, Votto has dropped off and
soooo, I am at it again (and hopefully this will spark another Votto and Reds
outburst). I am again “tugging on Superman’s cape.” However, before you
flood my inbox, phone, twitter, and facebook with accusations of hating Joey
Votto; hear me out.
I do not think Votto
sucks – I think quite the opposite – in fact, I have written articles making
the argument that he the best hitter in baseball. By MLB standards, Votto is
having a very good year. Here is the rub. Joey Votto is not your average very
good MLB player. He is an all-time great MLB player. And, more importantly,
this Reds team cannot win in October (or maybe even get to October) if Votto
performs just ‘very good.’ This team needs Votto to perform like the Votto this
league has come to know. They need Votto to bat .320ish. They need him to knock
in 100+ runs. They need 25-30 HRs. They need the walks. They need top of the
league in doubles. They can’t afford 140+ strikeouts (which Votto is currently
on pace for) or 18 errors (which he is also on pace for). Not from Joey Votto.
Maybe it isn’t fair to
expect Votto to have an MVP type year this year (or any year for that matter),
but that is: 1) what this offense needs of him in order to make and advance in
the playoffs, 2) it is what Votto has earned as his expectations, 3) quite
frankly it is what he is paid to do (like it or not, when you have the richest
contract in baseball, the expectation is that you will perform at a level which
will at least put you in the MVP discussion – that does not describe Votto in 2013
so far), and 4) last and most importantly, it is what Votto expects of himself.
Do you think Votto is satisfied with his play in 2013 so far? He is not. You
can see it on his face and in his reactions. Look at him and his reactions when
he strikes out or makes an error. He knows he is better than his performance
right now.
Is it fair to ask
Votto to bat .300? I think so. Is it fair to expect Votto to walk more often
than he strikes out? I think so. Is it fair to ask Votto to have an RBI/K ratio
of close to 1/1? I think so. Is it fair to ask your 2 time gold glove first
baseman to make less than 18 errors? Again, I think so. Here are the numbers
folks (don’t shoot the messenger):
Votto’s Average by
Month
Month
|
Avg.
|
April
|
.291
|
May
|
.388
|
June
|
.297
|
July
|
.267
|
He has been over .300
for exactly 1 out of 4 months. Yes, he was amazing in May, but, for nearly a
quarter of the season, Joey Votto is batting .289. Those are not Joey Votto
numbers. A .289 average won’t get most players into the All-Star Game unless
you have a name to carry you. And a .289 average from Joey Votto likely will
not mean good things for the Reds in October.
Votto’s K/BB/RBI by
Month
Month
|
K
|
BB
|
RBI
|
April
|
29
|
26
|
11
|
May
|
19
|
20
|
16
|
June
|
21
|
14
|
11
|
July
|
14
|
11
|
4
|
Again, only 1 month
(May…and barely) where Votto had more BB’s or RBI than K’s. The walks/K ratio
(.855) is just about at his average for the past 4 years (.820), but the K/RBI
ratio is disturbing. The last 4 years, Votto’s K/RBI ratio is 1.25 K/RBI. This
year? Nearly 2 K’s for every RBI (1.97 K/RBI)! Again, these are numbers are not
reminiscent of the Votto we know. Beyond the numbers, watch Votto. In the past,
you never felt like he gave away an AB. That can’t be said this year. This year
he has had numerous AB’s where he has looked lost. Sure he is on pace for a
career high in BB’s (121 to 110), but he is also on pace for a career high for
K’s (142 to 129). I am more concerned about K’s than I am excited about BB’s. I
can handle K’s if he is knocking in runs. The year he had 129 K’s, he had 103
RBI’s. This year he is on pace for 72 RBI’s with 142 K’s. That is a terrible
ratio.
Votto’s 2B’s by Month
Month
|
Avg.
|
April
|
3
|
May
|
7
|
June
|
5
|
July
|
4
|
Last year, in an
injury plagued 111 games, Votto had 44 2Bs. In 2013, he is on pace for just 32
in a full season.
Votto with Runners On
|
Bases Empty
|
Runners on
|
RISP
|
2013
|
.333
|
.297
|
.318
|
2012
|
.326
|
.353
|
.370
|
2011
|
.287
|
.339
|
.383
|
2010
|
.278
|
.379
|
.369
|
Most would say his low
RBI numbers are a result of no one being on. That is not necessarily true (see
below). The problem is Votto is not hitting the way he used to with runners on.
He is hitting 40-80 points lower with runners on in 2013 compared to the past 3
years and 50-75 points lower with RISP. That is a huge difference!
RBI’s
Votto is on pace for
72 RBI’s. Let that sink in for a second. 72. I know what you are thinking: “he
has no one on in front of him.” Well, not really. In his MVP year of 2010,
Votto had 130 AB’s with RISP (he had 113 RBI’s in 2010). He is on pace this
year for 146 AB’s with RISP. In 2011, 146 AB’s with RISP and 103 RBI. In 2012,
73 AB’s with RISP and 56 RBI’s. So, he is actually hitting just as much (or
more) in 2013 with RISP and yet is on pace for about 2/3 the RBI.
Votto’s Errors
He has 10 errors in 94
games (1 every 9.4 games). His previous high? 11…for a year!
Lastly, look at the
numbers below:
|
AB
|
R
|
H
|
2B
|
BB
|
K
|
RBI
|
HR
|
AVG
|
OBP
|
SLG
|
OPS
|
A
|
571
|
101
|
185
|
44
|
46
|
36
|
99
|
24
|
.324
|
.381
|
.534
|
.916
|
B
|
600
|
113
|
191
|
32
|
121
|
142
|
72
|
26
|
.318
|
.434
|
.506
|
.939
|
Player A is Sean Casey
from 2004. 2004 was in Casey’s hey day and was one of his better years.
Player B is Votto’s
projected 2013 numbers. I don’t think anyone would argue that Casey is/was a
better player than Votto, but looking at these comparisons makes Votto (this
year) look like a very expensive Sean Casey. In fact, Casey had 3 years very
similar to the one above. Votto is on pace for 27 less RBI’s than Casey, 12
less 2B’s, and 4 times as many strikeouts…4 times as many strikeouts. So, what’s
my point? My point is that no one would argue that Casey is the player Votto
is, but, the guys around Casey in his years couldn’t hold a candle to the guys
Votto has around him, yet Casey had better numbers. Votto is playing ok, but ok
just won’t cut it this year. The Reds need great from him.
In reference to my
earlier article on Votto, I stated that the Reds success very closely mirrors
that of Votto. I was ridiculed. Chew on this for a bit…in May, Votto was on a
terror batting .388, he had his most 2B’s (7), HR’s (6), RBI’s (16), and the
Reds were 11 games over .500. On July 19th they are still 11 over
.500. Outside of May, Votto has been average (.289) – and so have the Reds
(34-34). Coincidence? I think not.
No comments:
Post a Comment